Abstract Two forms of naturalistic evaluation have appeared in the literature within the past decade. One form treats this perspective as a collection of usually qualitative techniques that are complementary with conventional quantitative methods. The second form represents an alternative paradigm for evaluation. It emphasizes the negotiation of multiple socially‐constructed realities, interdependence of facts and values, and the emergent character of the evaluation process.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 126 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.