SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Modeling Relevance
0 references·16 citing·57 second hopsampled
Modeling Relevance (1977)Modeling RelevanceTrial by Statistics: Is a High Probability of Guilt Enough to Convict? (2018)Trial by Statistics: Is a Hig…SAFETY VS. SENSITIVITY: POSSIBLE WORLDS AND THE LAW OF EVIDENCE (2018)SAFETY VS. SENSITIVITY: POSSI…Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law (2017)Truth, knowledge, and the sta…The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It (2016)The Politically Motivated Rea…Laws of cognition and the cognition of law (2014)Laws of cognition and the cog…When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case) (2013)When ‘neutral’ evidence still…The subjectivist interpretation of probability and the problem of individualisation in forensic science (2013)The subjectivist interpretati…Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence? (2013)Do Jurors Give Appropriate We…Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform (2012)Costs and Benefits of Eyewitn…Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: Underlying logic and argumentative implications (2008)Decision theoretic properties…The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence (2006)The Problematic Value of Math…Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis (1996)Differential Treatment of Cor…The Emergence of Extralegal BIAS During Jury Deliberation (1990)The Emergence of Extralegal B…Probability and the Processes of Discovery, Proof, and Choice (1988)Probability and the Processes…A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials (1988)A Reconceptualization of Civi…On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. (1985)On the inefficacy of limiting…Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Showups versus lineups: An evaluation using ROC analysis. (2012)Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Procedures Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis (2014)Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. (2015)Theory of games and economic behavior (2019)Attribution theory in social psychology (1967)Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1975)The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process (1977)Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule. (1997)On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. (1997)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (2004)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Identification, individualization and uniqueness: What's the difference? (2009)Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States (2014)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Foundations of social theory (1990)Goal conflict in juror assessments of compensatory and punitive damages. (1999)The effects of injury severity on jury negligence decisions. (1999)The Second Face of Evil: Wrongdoing in and by the Corporation (1999)The American Jury (1971)Reducing the effects of juror bias. (1978)Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. (1988)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Screening Job Applicants: The Impact of Physical Attractiveness and Application Quality (2000)Physical Attractiveness of an Animal Species as a Decision Factor for its Preservation (2001)Fuzzy sets (1965)Knowledge, probability, and credibility (1989)Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson (2002)Against Coherence (2005)The Probable and The Provable (1977)Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982)The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety (2001)Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)The Burdens of Proof (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty (2017)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Handbook of self and identity (2003)Cultural cognition of scientific consensus (2010)Political Misinformation (2020)The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. (2020)The Evolving Field of Risk Communication (2020)Epistemology and Cognition (1987)Knowledge and Its Limits (2000)Knowledge and its Limits (2002)Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence (2019)The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof (2019)Knowledge and Legal Proof (2022)Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1968)Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge (1976)Inference to the Best Explanation (2003)Better that ten guilty persons escape: punishment costs explain the standard of evidence (2011)Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation (2014)Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It341 cited
  • 2012Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform187 cited
  • 2006The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence102 cited
  • 2008Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: Underlying logic and argumentative implications96 cited
  • 2017Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law95 cited
  • 1985On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt.90 cited
  • 1988Probability and the Processes of Discovery, Proof, and Choice87 cited
  • 1988A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials83 cited
  • 1996Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis72 cited
  • 1990The Emergence of Extralegal BIAS During Jury Deliberation62 cited
  • 2013When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case)43 cited
  • 2013The subjectivist interpretation of probability and the problem of individualisation in forensic science40 cited
  • 2018SAFETY VS. SENSITIVITY: POSSIBLE WORLDS AND THE LAW OF EVIDENCE40 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?
37 cited
  • 2018Trial by Statistics: Is a High Probability of Guilt Enough to Convict?34 cited
  • 2014Laws of cognition and the cognition of law34 cited