SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rank injustice
1 references·16 citing·54 second hop
Rank injustice (2002)Rank injusticeCompetition and Careers in Biosciences (2001)Competition and Careers in Bi…The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship (2020)The transformative power of v…Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science (2020)Civil disobedience in scienti…Accounting as a dichotomised discipline: An analysis of the source materials used in the construction of accounting articles (2019)Accounting as a dichotomised …The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures (2017)The future of research assess…Science, narcissism and the quest for visibility (2017)Science, narcissism and the q…“Second Language Writing” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis (2017)“Second Language Writing” Pub…(A)Historical Science (2015)(A)Historical ScienceParallel worlds of citable documents and others: Inflated commissioned opinion articles enhance scientometric indicators (2014)Parallel worlds of citable do…Disseminating Knowledge: From Potential to Reality—New Open-Access Journals Collide With Convention (2014)Disseminating Knowledge: From…Is the Nobel Prize good for science? (2013)Is the Nobel Prize good for s…Productividad e impacto de los investigadores españoles: umbrales de referencia por áreas científicas (2011)Productividad e impacto de lo…Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit (2010)Influences on Authorship Issu…Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings (2009)Accounting journals and the A…The mismeasurement of science (2007)The mismeasurement of scienceGraduate Students and the Culture of Authorship (2006)Graduate Students and the Cul…Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Authorship in a small medical…Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts (1981)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 (2006)The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships (2007)When Authorship Fails (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” (2000)Deconstructing doctoral dissertations: how many papers does it take to make a PhD? (2010)Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? (2017)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)When Authorship Fails (1997)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art (2012)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee (2009)Species-specific responses of Late Quaternary megafauna to climate and humans (2011)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research (2001)Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (2010)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Price of Journals in Geography (2016)Research Handbook of Expatriates (2017)Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals (2020)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (2004)Revolutionary Science (2016)Did Alexander Fleming Deserve the Nobel Prize? (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Power, approach, and inhibition. (2003)“Invincibles” and “invisibles”: CEO status and the ‘Matthew effect’ in strategic decision-making (2019)Creativity and the Dark Triad: A meta-analysis (2021)Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research (2024)How Professors Think (2009)Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities (2011)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)La evaluación de las Humanidades y de las Ciencias Sociales en revisión (2018)The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system (2018)Understanding the Societal Impact of the Social Sciences and Humanities: Remarks on Roles, Challenges, and Expectations (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Global inequity in scientific names and who they honor (2020)Authorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility (2021)Epistemic disobedience–Undoing coloniality in global health research (2024)The University in Ruins (1997)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure (2022)The SCOPE framework – implementing ideals of responsible research assessment (2024)Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Competition and Careers in Biosciences105 cited

Cited by

  • 2007The mismeasurement of science296 cited
  • 2004Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors67 cited
  • 2006Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship57 cited
  • 2020The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship43 cited
  • 2020Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science41 cited
  • 2017Science, narcissism and the quest for visibility41 cited
  • 2014Disseminating Knowledge: From Potential to Reality—New Open-Access Journals Collide With Convention39 cited
  • 2017The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures38 cited
  • 2013Is the Nobel Prize good for science?34 cited
  • 2009Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings30 cited
  • 2017“Second Language Writing” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis30 cited
  • 2010Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit29 cited
  • 2019Accounting as a dichotomised discipline: An analysis of the source materials used in the construction of accounting articles24 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

(A)Historical Science
20 cited
  • 2014Parallel worlds of citable documents and others: Inflated commissioned opinion articles enhance scientometric indicators20 cited
  • 2011Productividad e impacto de los investigadores españoles: umbrales de referencia por áreas científicas17 cited