SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Cardiac Surgery: Rules of the Road – Part 2
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Cardiac Surgery: Rules of the Road – Part 2 (2020)Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in C…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Interpretation of random effe…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Operating Characteristics of …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis (2013)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias16,951 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,872 cited
  • 2015Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data2,123 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.