SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK
0 references·3 citing·11 second hop
A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK (2012)A consensus statement on research miscond…Preventing fraud in biomedical research (2022)Preventing fraud in biomedica…Fraud in scientific research – birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom (2013)Fraud in scientific research …Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct? (2012)Who is responsible for invest…Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study (2010)How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed (2011)Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Research misconduct: time for a re‐think? (2016)Multiple Publications: The Main Reason for the Retraction of Papers in Computer Science (2018)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Fraud in scientific research – birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom20 cited
  • 2012Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?17 cited
  • 2022Preventing fraud in biomedical research15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work