Work2005

Editorial: The Sixth Interfaces Ranking of Universities’ Contributions to the Practice Literature

9 citations0/0 files storedINFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Higher Education Governance and Development Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

For the sixth time, I rank universities according to their contributions to the practice literature. I trace the evolution of the rankings of the top universities. Carnegie Mellon University is now top ranked. Erasmus University is now the top-ranked non-US university. For the first time, the practice publication rate of the top-ranked universities is higher than it was in the immediately preceding ranking.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The First Interfaces Ranking 2002Editorial: Leveling the Field? The Fourth Interfaces Ranking of Universities' Contribution to the Practice Literature 2004Editorial: The Fifth Interfaces Ranking of Universities’ Contributions to the Practice Literature 1997Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The Second Interfaces Ranking 1999Editorial: The Third Interfaces Ranking of Universities' Contributions to the Practice Literature

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.