SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Frequency estimation and semantic ambiguity do not eliminate conjunction bias, when it occurs: Replication and extension of Mellers, Hertwig, and Kahneman (2001)
16 references·0 citing·53 second hopsampled
Frequency estimation and semantic ambiguity do not eliminate conjunction bias, when it occurs: Replication and extension of Mellers, Hertwig, and Kahneman (2001) (2020)Frequency estimation and semantic ambigui…A Brief Guide to Evaluate Replications (2019)A Brief Guide to Evaluate Rep…A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings (2018)A Unified Framework to Quanti…Making Replication Mainstream (2017)Making Replication MainstreamPre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Pre-registration in social ps…Explaining High Conjunction Fallacy Rates: The Probability Theory Plus Noise Account (2016)Explaining High Conjunction F…Small Telescopes (2015)Small TelescopesEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? (2013)The Replication Recipe: What …Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration (2001)Do Frequency Representations …The ‘conjunction fallacy’ revisited: how intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors (1999)The ‘conjunction fallacy’ rev…Many Reasons or Just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem (1998)Many Reasons or Just One: How…On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. (1996)On narrow norms and vague heu…Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach (1996)Component probabilities and t…The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors (1988)The dependence of the conjunc…The Conjunction Error and the Representativeness Heuristic (1985)The Conjunction Error and the…Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Extensional versus intuitive …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution (1982)Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. (1989)CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (1996)Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability (2002)Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1986)Studies in the Way of Words (1989)Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists? (2000)A model of heuristic judgment (2005)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)On the reality of cognitive illusions. (1996)Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. (1996)Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing (2001)Flawed Self-Assessment (2004)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment (2012)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? (2020)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review (2002)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition (2007)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The New Statistics (2013)Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study (2020)Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies (2020)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. (2020)Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies (2021)Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework (2022)A power primer. (1992)A power primer. (1992)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)Social physics (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 1983Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.3,990 cited
  • 1996On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky.1,070 cited
  • 2015Small Telescopes742 cited
  • 2013The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?706 cited
  • 1999The ‘conjunction fallacy’ revisited: how intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors538 cited
  • 2001Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration449 cited
  • 2016Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template439 cited
  • 1988The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors422 cited
  • 2018A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings214 cited
  • 2019A Brief Guide to Evaluate Replications87 cited
  • 2017Making Replication Mainstream73 cited
  • 1998Many Reasons or Just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem59 cited
  • 1985The Conjunction Error and the Representativeness Heuristic50 cited
  • 2016Explaining High Conjunction Fallacy Rates: The Probability Theory Plus Noise Account

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

46 cited
  • 1996Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach41 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.