SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why Bibliometric Indicators Break Down: Unstable Parameters, Incorrect Models and Irrelevant Properties
16 references·3 citing·46 second hop
Why Bibliometric Indicators Break Down: Unstable Parameters, Incorrect Models and Irrelevant Properties (2018)Why Bibliometric Indicators Break Down: U…Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling (2017)Why researchers publish in no…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Evaluation practices and effe…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration…Frugality, Grassroots and Inclusiveness: New Challenges for Mainstream Innovation Theories (2013)Frugality, Grassroots and Inc…Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development (2013)Excellence or quality? Impact…How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)How journal rankings can supp…Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Caveats for the journal and f…The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: a multidimensional construct (2009)The entrepreneurial motivatio…Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2008)Differences in impact factor …The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations (2007)The Social Construction Of Bi…Impact factor and education journals: a critical examination and analysis (2006)Impact factor and education j…Science policies as principal–agent games (1998)Science policies as principal…Assessing basic research Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy (1983)Assessing basic research Some…The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. (1966)The Conduct of Inquiry: Metho…Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case (2024)Meeting evaluation criteria b…Research impact seen from the user side (2023)Research impact seen from the…‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure (2022)‘I want to be able to do what…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Eigenfactor MetricsTM: A Network Approach to Assessing Scholarly Journals (2010)Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update (2013)Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology (2013)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications (2011)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)What is research collaboration? (1997)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. (1964)The University in Ruins (1997)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives (2020)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)Foundations of social theory (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)Lasting tensions in research policy-making - a delegation problem (2003)R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)On Justification (2006)Governing Science (2016)A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? (2018)Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management581 cited
  • 2015Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review466 cited
  • 2013Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development280 cited
  • 2008Differences in impact factor across fields and over time267 cited
  • 2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance190 cited
  • 2013The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment171 cited
  • 1998Science policies as principal–agent games165 cited
  • 2017Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling120 cited
  • 2007The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations102 cited
  • 2009The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: a multidimensional construct85 cited
  • 2013Frugality, Grassroots and Inclusiveness: New Challenges for Mainstream Innovation Theories56 cited
  • 1966The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

53 cited
  • 2006Impact factor and education journals: a critical examination and analysis51 cited
  • 1983Assessing basic research Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy41 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure12 cited
    • 2023Research impact seen from the user side9 cited
    • 2024Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case8 cited