No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This article offers a critical analysis of institutional discourse(s) about English, analysing what discourses dominate, how and why particular discourses come to dominate, and the extent to which these discourses remain endorsed. Furthermore, the paper considers the relationship between language, identity and power relations, specifically how learners are socialised into different identity positions. Discourse is understood as a ‘general mode of semiosis’ (Blommaert 2005, 2) and conceptualised as a socially situated construct. In this paper the view that discourse is reflective of and constitutes a particular social context and social practices, is considered to be critical. Institutional discourses suggest that ‘good’ proficiency in English is privileged above all else. The value attached to linguistic competence in English renders some learners ‘successful’ and others ‘unsuccessful’.This means that competence in English as the Language of Learning and Teaching is seen to be equivalent to a more favourable position of identity. Those who possess this kind of competence are privileged and engender more authority in relation to other learners.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.