SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady‐state science (1900–2004)
11 references·16 citing·35 second hop
Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady‐state science (1900–2004) (2007)Long‐term variations in the aging of scie…The emergence of China as a leading nation in science (2005)The emergence of China as a l…The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)The Access/Impact Problem and…The rapid evolution of scholarly communication (2002)The rapid evolution of schola…A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences (1999)A bibliometric study of refer…A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature (1995)A bibliometric study on agein…Prometheus Bound (1994)Prometheus BoundCommunication among scientists and engineers (1970)Communication among scientist…Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)Social Theory and Social Stru…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Networks of Scientific PapersTHE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC R…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceDoes double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference (2021)Does double‐blind peer review…Factors affecting the frequency of citation of an article (2020)Factors affecting the frequen…Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation (2019)Methods to account for citati…Bibliometric Delineation of Scientific Fields (2019)Bibliometric Delineation of S…The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)The memory of science: Inflat…The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)The memory of science: Inflat…The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future (2017)The time dimension of science…Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)Are Mendeley reader counts hi…ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2016)ResearchGate articles: Age, d…National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers (2015)National research impact indi…M endeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2015)M endeley readership counts: …Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (2014)Exploring the interdisciplina…arXiv E‐prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships (2014)arXiv E‐prints and the journa…What a difference a colon makes: how superficial factors influence subsequent citation (2013)What a difference a colon mak…How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers? (2012)How Are Academic Age, Product…National research impact indicators from Mendeley readersNational research impact indi…The "impact factor" revisited (2005)Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014)Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity (2015)Social Studies of Science (2017)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution (2010)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Authors and open access publishing (2004)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Learning by Expanding (2014)Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities (2006)Extending citation analysis to non-source items (2006)The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible (2006)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)The significance of disciplinary differences (1994)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority (1996)Where Is Science Going? (1996)Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes (2002)Culture and Organizations (1980)The Network Structure Of Social Capital (2000)The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS8,424 cited
  • 1969Social Theory and Social Structure.6,660 cited
  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
  • 2005The emergence of China as a leading nation in science541 cited
  • 2004The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access529 cited
  • 1970Communication among scientists and engineers466 cited
  • 1994Prometheus Bound318 cited
  • 1999A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences279 cited
  • 1995A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature232 cited
  • 2002The rapid evolution of scholarly communication159 cited

Cited by

  • 2014arXiv E‐prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships130 cited
  • 2016ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact116 cited
  • 2012How Are Academic Age, Productivity and Collaboration Related to Citing Behavior of Researchers?105 cited
  • 2013What a difference a colon makes: how superficial factors influence subsequent citation99 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation97 cited
  • 2018The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network79 cited
  • 2018The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network76 cited
  • 2015M endeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences72 cited
  • 2021Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference55 cited
  • 2014Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology55 cited
  • 2019Bibliometric Delineation of Scientific Fields55 cited
  • n.d.National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers54 cited
  • 2015National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers45 cited
  • 2017The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future43 cited
  • 2017Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?42 cited
  • 2020Factors affecting the frequency of citation of an article41 cited