SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rethinking retractions
0 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Rethinking retractions (2018)Rethinking retractionsCauses for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices (2023)Causes for Retraction in the …Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey (2022)Analysis of Retracted Publica…Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)Research ethics: a profile of…Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)Requiem for impact factors an…Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice (2021)Inconsistent and incomplete r…Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)Fraud in scientific publicati…A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature (2021)A survey of retractions in th…A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction (2021)A cross-disciplinary and seve…Should research misconduct be criminalized? (2020)Should research misconduct be…Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review (2020)Self-correction of science: a…Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration? (2020)Retraction: The “Other Face” …Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Continued post-retraction cit…Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018 (2019)Reasons for and time to retra…Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities (2019)Establishing and Maintaining …Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections? (2017)Amending published articles: …Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science (2019)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19 (2021)The Ethical Compass: Establishing ethical guidelines for research practices in sports medicine and exercise science (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review (2023)Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health (2024)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)An Overview of Post-Publication Peer Review (2021)Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used (2021)The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation (2021)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network (2009)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Papers (2021)Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)A bibliometric investigation of the journals that were repeatedly suppressed from Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports (2022)Assessing the impact of environmental accounting research: evidence from citation and journal data (2022)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored (2023)Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data (2023)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality (2024)Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data (2024)Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections (2018)An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data88 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2020Should research misconduct be criminalized?79 cited
  • 2019Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 201871 cited
  • 2023Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices54 cited
  • 2020Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review51 cited
  • 2021Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges50 cited
  • 2021Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice48 cited
  • 2017Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections?46 cited
  • 2020Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration?45 cited
  • 2021Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities42 cited
  • 2021A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction41 cited
  • 2021A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature38 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2022Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey36 cited
  • 2019Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities31 cited
  • 2021Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions.26 cited