No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract Argues for the thesis that to explain an event is to provide some information about its causal history. This involves showing that there are no noncausal explanations of particular events, distinguishing between two kinds of why‐questions (plain and contrastive), and comparing the proposed account of explanation with the “covering‐law model” of Hempel and others.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 389 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.