SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise
0 references·4 citing·15 second hop
When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise (2007)When are randomised trials unnecessary? P…Assessing the quality of evidence on safety: specifications for application and suggestions for adaptions of the GRADE-criteria in the context of preparing a list of potentially inappropriate medications for older adults (2022)Assessing the quality of evid…STS as a Third Space between Evidence-Based Medicine and the Human Sciences (2021)STS as a Third Space between …To RCT or not to RCT: deciding when ‘more evidence is needed’ for public health policy and practice (2011)To RCT or not to RCT: decidin…De Testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions (2008)De Testimonio: on the evidenc…Out of Control (1995)What works?Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (2000)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Pharmacoeconomics: NICE's approach to decision‐making (2009)Comparison of specialist and nonspecialist care pathways for adolescents with anorexia nervosa and related eating disorders (2012)Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long‐term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment‐resistant depression: the Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS) (2015)10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' (1992)Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time (1995)An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic (2001)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2008De Testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions222 cited
  • 2011To RCT or not to RCT: deciding when ‘more evidence is needed’ for public health policy and practice35 cited
  • 2021STS as a Third Space between Evidence-Based Medicine and the Human Sciences8 cited
  • 2022Assessing the quality of evidence on safety: specifications for application and suggestions for adaptions of the GRADE-criteria in the context of preparing a list of potentially inappropriate medications for older adults5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work