References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 1982A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study57 cited
• 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
• 1982Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science51 cited
• 1982Publication, politics, and scientific progress51 cited
• 1984Criteria for Identifying a Refereed Journal50 cited
• 1982Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?50 cited
• 1982Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics50 cited
• 1982What is the source of bias in peer review?47 cited
• 1982On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”47 cited
• 2017Peer Review: From “Sacred Ideals” to “Profane Realities”46 cited
• 1982Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts41 cited
• 1982Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected41 cited
• 1982When will the editors start to edit?40 cited
• 1991Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?39 cited
• 1982Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions