SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cognitive Assessment
0 references·14 citing·33 second hop
Cognitive Assessment (2009)Cognitive AssessmentLearning Attribute Hierarchies From Data: Two Exploratory Approaches (2020)Learning Attribute Hierarchie…International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models (2020)International Comparative Stu…On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models (2019)On the Identifiability of Dia…Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment (2018)Comparison among cognitive di…Identifying Latent Structures in Restricted Latent Class Models (2017)Identifying Latent Structures…The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies (2016)The Impact of Q-Matrix Design…Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis (2016)Regularized Latent Class Anal…Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models (2015)Identifiability of Diagnostic…Attribute‐Level and Pattern‐Level Classification Consistency and Accuracy Indices for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment (2015)Attribute‐Level and Pattern‐L…Theory of self-learning $Q$-matrix (2013)Theory of self-learning $Q$-m…A Matrix Factorization Method for Mapping Items to Skills and for Enhancing Expert-Based Q-Matrices (2013)A Matrix Factorization Method…The Psychometric Modeling of Ordered Multiple-Choice Item Responses For Diagnostic Assessment With A Learning Progression (2012)The Psychometric Modeling of …The Impact of Model Misspecification on Parameter Estimation and Item‐Fit Assessment in Log‐Linear Diagnostic Classification Models (2012)The Impact of Model Misspecif…Reporting Diagnostic Scores in Educational Testing: Temptations, Pitfalls, and Some Solutions (2010)Reporting Diagnostic Scores i…RULE SPACE: AN APPROACH FOR DEALING WITH MISCONCEPTIONS BASED ON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY (1983)An Empirically Based Method of Q‐Matrix Validation for the DINA Model: Development and Applications (2008)On the Analysis of Fraction Subtraction Data: The DINA Model, Classification, Latent Class Sizes, and the Q-Matrix (2010)Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (1961)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)National Science Education Standards (1995)Test Theory: A Unified Treatment (1999)Item response theory for psychologists (2000)Applied Latent Class Analysis (2002)The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model (2018)An empirical Q‐matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model (2019)A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis (2020)Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. (2006)Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. (2010)The Generalized DINA Model Framework (2011)A “conditional” sense of fairness in assessment (2013)Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions (2013)Evaluating the Wald Test for Item‐Level Comparison of Saturated and Reduced Models in Cognitive Diagnosis (2013)Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory (2001)On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha (2008)The standards for educational and psychological testing. (2013)Measures of Agreement to Assess Attribute‐Level Classification Accuracy and Consistency for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments (2018)Developing individualized feedback for listening assessment: Combining standard setting and cognitive diagnostic assessment approaches (2021)DINA Model and Parameter Estimation: A Didactic (2008)Exploratory Latent Structure Analysis Using Both Identifiable and Unidentifiable Models (1974)Multidimensional Item Response Theory (2009)Partial identifiability of restricted latent class models (2020)Mathematics as an Educational Task (1972)Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe (2009)An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation (2019)Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix (2017)Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times (2017)Identifiability of restricted latent class models with binary responses (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012The Impact of Model Misspecification on Parameter Estimation and Item‐Fit Assessment in Log‐Linear Diagnostic Classification Models124 cited
  • 2017Identifying Latent Structures in Restricted Latent Class Models121 cited
  • 2015Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models116 cited
  • 2013Theory of self-learning $Q$-matrix84 cited
  • 2015Attribute‐Level and Pattern‐Level Classification Consistency and Accuracy Indices for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment63 cited
  • 2020International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models58 cited
  • 2013A Matrix Factorization Method for Mapping Items to Skills and for Enhancing Expert-Based Q-Matrices55 cited
  • 2019On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models51 cited
  • 2012The Psychometric Modeling of Ordered Multiple-Choice Item Responses For Diagnostic Assessment With A Learning Progression48 cited
  • 2016The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies44 cited
  • 2018Comparison among cognitive diagnostic models for the TIMSS 2007 fourth grade mathematics assessment42 cited
  • 2010Reporting Diagnostic Scores in Educational Testing: Temptations, Pitfalls, and Some Solutions38 cited
  • 2016Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

37 cited
  • 2020Learning Attribute Hierarchies From Data: Two Exploratory Approaches36 cited