A Method for Comparing Scholarly Journals as Service Providers to Authors

Bo‐Christer Björk · Anssi Öörni

29 citations0/0 files storedSerials Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing

Abstract

When authors of scholarly articles decide where to submit their manuscripts for peer review and eventual publication, they often base their choice of journals on very incomplete information about how well the journals serve the authors’ purposes of informing about their research and advancing their academic careers. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new method for benchmarking scientific journals, thereby providing more information to prospective authors. The method estimates a number of journal parameters, including readership, scientific prestige, time from submission to publication, acceptance rate and service provided by the journal during the review and publication process. Data directly obtainable from the Web, data that can be calculated from such data, data obtained from publishers and editors, and data obtained using surveys with authors are used in the method, which has been tested on three different sets of journals, each from a different discipline.We found a number of problems with the different data acquisition methods, which limit the extent to which the method can be used. Publishers and editors are reluctant to disclose important information they have at hand (i.e., journal circulation, Web downloads, acceptance rate). The calculation of some important parameters (for instance, average time from submission to publication, regional spread of authorship) can be done but requires quite a lot of work. It can be difficult to get reasonable response rates to surveys with authors. All in all, we believe that the method we propose, taking a “service to authors” perspective as a basis for benchmarking scientific journals, is useful and can provide information that is valuable to prospective authors in selected scientific disciplines.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1999‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals 2008Where to submit? Journal choice by construction management authors 2006Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint 2002Authors’ Perceptions and Preferences Among Real Estate Journals 2000How Scientists Retrieve Publications: An Empirical Study of How the Internet Is Overtaking Paper Media

Cited by

2020Factors influencing the choice of a publication venue in library and information science 2015The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence‐consistent Shift?2022The Difference in Open Innovation between Open Access and Closed Access, According to the Change of Collective Intelligence and Knowledge Amount 2016Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal 2016Library Consortia and Article Processing Charges: An International Survey

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.