SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do open‐access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? A bibliometric study of selected open‐access journals using Google Scholar
16 references·12 citing·39 second hop
Do open‐access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? A bibliometric study of selected open‐access journals using Google Scholar (2008)Do open‐access journals in library and in…Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi‐discipline exploratory analysis (2007)Google Scholar citations and …Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Google Scholar as a new sourc…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006)Earlier Web usage statistics …Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts (2006)Deflated, inflated and phanto…Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines (2005)Web citation data for impact …Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes (2005)Google Scholar: The New Gener…An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment (2005)An Examination of Citation Co…Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality (2003)Counting on citations: a flaw…Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? (2003)Bibliographic and Web citatio…The counting house (2002)The counting houseWhy the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Journal accused of manipulating impact factor (1997)Journal accused of manipulati…A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature (1995)A bibliometric study on agein…The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance (1985)The use of bibliometric data …Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists (1978)Discipline impact factors: A …Visibility and growth of LIS research publications: a Scopus based analysis of select open access journals during 2001 to 2015 (2019)Visibility and growth of LIS …Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India (2019)Acceptance and adoption of op…Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus (2017)Status and quality of open ac…Comparing Downloads, Mendeley Readership and Google Scholar Citations as Indicators of Article Performance (2017)Comparing Downloads, Mendeley…Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science (2017)Comparative study of characte…The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI (2016)The status of open access lib…Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (2000 – 2013): A Bibliometric Study (2016)Electronic Journal of Informa…Positioning Open Access Journals in a LIS Journal Ranking (2012)Positioning Open Access Journ…GOOGLE ACADÊMICO COMO FERRAMENTA PARA OS ESTUDOS DE CITAÇÕES: Avaliação da Precisão das Buscas por Autor (2012)GOOGLE ACADÊMICO COMO FERRAME…The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations (2011)The relationship between co-a…Scholarly impact measurements of LIS open access journals: based on citations and links (2011)Scholarly impact measurements…A “librarian‐LIS faculty” divide in open access practice (2011)A “librarian‐LIS faculty” div…Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2006)Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts (2011)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014)Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity (2015)Social Studies of Science (2017)Cultural diversity in organizations : theory, research, and practice (1993)The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye (2002)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Design-Based Research (2012)Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping (2014)How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept (2016)Assessing basic research (1983)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review (2022)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar (2009)Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2010)Non-Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizational Effectiveness: A Modern Synthesis (2011)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences (2000)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines (2007)Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline (2013)Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET (2014)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus (2008)A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis676 cited
  • 1985The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance471 cited
  • 2002The counting house447 cited
  • 2006Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact402 cited
  • 2005Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes292 cited
  • 1995A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature232 cited
  • 2005An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment215 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi‐discipline exploratory analysis210 cited
  • 2003Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality166 cited
  • 2006Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts156 cited
  • 1997Journal accused of manipulating impact factor152 cited
  • 2003Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference?146 cited
  • 1978Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

132 cited
  • 2005Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines111 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus28 cited
    • 2011The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations27 cited
    • 2011Scholarly impact measurements of LIS open access journals: based on citations and links26 cited
    • 2012Positioning Open Access Journals in a LIS Journal Ranking26 cited
    • 2017Comparative study of characteristics of authors between open access and non-open access journals in library and information science22 cited
    • 2011A “librarian‐LIS faculty” divide in open access practice19 cited
    • 2016The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI19 cited
    • 2012GOOGLE ACADÊMICO COMO FERRAMENTA PARA OS ESTUDOS DE CITAÇÕES: Avaliação da Precisão das Buscas por Autor17 cited
    • 2019Visibility and growth of LIS research publications: a Scopus based analysis of select open access journals during 2001 to 201516 cited
    • 2017Comparing Downloads, Mendeley Readership and Google Scholar Citations as Indicators of Article Performance15 cited
    • 2019Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India12 cited
    • 2016Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (2000 – 2013): A Bibliometric Study12 cited