Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis

Lawrence E. Blume · Daniel L. Rubinfeld

142 citations0/0 files storedCalifornia Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Property Rights and Legal Doctrine Legal and Constitutional Studies Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Abstract

Analyzes the provisions of the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution related to the regulatory takings and just compensation for private properties in the 1980s. Decision on the supreme court case Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon; Regulation of lower courts on regulatory takings; Provisions on compensation as insurance against regulatory takings.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 142 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime 2000The Strategic Constitution 2005Public versus Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Standing and Remedy 2004Economic Analysis of the Law 2005Public vs. Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Of Standing and Remedy 2000The Economics of Takings and Compensation When Land and Its Public Use Value Are in Private Hands 2004The Economics of Public International Law 1989A constitutional choice model of compensation for takings

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.