No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
abstract In this paper moralism is defined as the illicit use of moral considerations. Three different varieties of moralism are then discussed — moral absolutism, excessive standards and demandingness, and presenting non-moral considerations as moral ones. Both individuals and theories can be regarded as moralistic in some of these senses. Indeed, some critics of consequentialism have regarded that theory as moralistic. The author then describes the problems associated with each sense of ‘moralism’ and how casuistry evolved to try to deal with some of these problems. The author also defends consequentialism against one charge of moralism [1].
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.