SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct
0 references·16 citing·51 second hopsampled
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct (1990)Underreporting research is scientific mis…Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems (2019)Clarifying differences betwee…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Full publication of results i…Does health informatics have a replication crisis? (2018)Does health informatics have …Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. (2015)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Systematic review and meta-analysis: techniques and a guide for the academic surgeon. (2015)Systematic review and meta-an…Why Are Medical and Health-Related Studies Not Being Published? A Systematic Review of Reasons Given by Investigators (2014)Why Are Medical and Health-Re…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Publication Bias in Recent Meta-Analyses (2013)Publication Bias in Recent Me…Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy (2011)Completeness and Changes in R…An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals (2010)An assessment of quality char…Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias (2005)Systematic review of publicat…From the Editor (2003)From the EditorPublication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting (2002)Publication bias in gastroent…Time to register randomised trials (1999)Time to register randomised t…NIH clinical trials and publication bias. (1993)NIH clinical trials and publi…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Male-to-Female Vaginoplasty—Where We Are Today (2018)Community Engagement in Vaccination Promotion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Evidence For and Against Evidence-Based Practice (2004)Operationalizing Evidence-Based Practice (2007)A Historical Analysis of Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: The Unfinished Journey toward an Empirically Grounded Profession (2014)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials (2013)Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals (2013)Prospective registration and reporting of trial number in randomised clinical trials: global cross sectional study of the adoption of ICMJE and Declaration of Helsinki recommendations (2020)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias (2018)Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence (2020)Should research misconduct be criminalized? (2020)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Forensic Economics (2012)The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review (2012)p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates. (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)The Many Meanings of Research Utilization (1979)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2021)Conceptualising Primary-Secondary School Transitions: A Systematic Mapping Review of Worldviews, Theories and Frameworks (2021)Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review (2024)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review (2020)Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts307 cited
  • 1993NIH clinical trials and publication bias.293 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2015Systematic review and meta-analysis: techniques and a guide for the academic surgeon.165 cited
  • 2005Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias153 cited
  • 2003From the Editor134 cited
  • 2014Why Are Medical and Health-Related Studies Not Being Published? A Systematic Review of Reasons Given by Investigators117 cited
  • 2011Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy115 cited
  • 2019Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems114 cited
  • 2018Does health informatics have a replication crisis?106 cited
  • 2015Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist.104 cited
  • 2002Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

103 cited
  • 2013Publication Bias in Recent Meta-Analyses97 cited
  • 2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
  • 1999Time to register randomised trials91 cited