SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Joint editorial – Fostering innovation and improving impact assessment for journal publications in hydrology
10 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Joint editorial – Fostering innovation and improving impact assessment for journal publications in hydrology (2016)Joint editorial – Fostering innovation an…Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions (2015)Will technology trample peer …Reproducible Research in Vadose Zone Sciences (2015)Reproducible Research in Vado…Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma? (2015)Offline: What is medicine's 5…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Joint Editorial—On the future of journal publications in hydrology (2014)Joint Editorial—On the future…Meta‐analysis inside and outside particle physics: convergence using the path of least resistance? (2013)Meta‐analysis inside and outs…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research (2009)Evidence synthesis as the key…Something rotten at the core of science? (2001)Something rotten at the core …Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)Best evidence synthesis: An i…Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science? (2016)Most computational hydrology …The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. (2002)Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies* (2007)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data (2014)Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Joint editorial – Fostering innovation and improving impact assessment for journal publications in hydrology (2016)Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives (2017)The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count (2020)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Development of a cloud-based platform for reproducible science: A case study of an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Assessment (2016)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How successfully is open-source research software adopted? Results and implications of surveying the users of a sensitivity analysis toolbox (2019)What has Global Sensitivity Analysis ever done for us? A systematic review to support scientific advancement and to inform policy-making in earth system modelling (2019)Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach (2020)Editorial—Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies (2007)Joint Editorial—Fostering Innovation and Improving Impact Assessment for Journal Publications in Hydrology (2016)Joint editorial: Fostering innovation and improving impact assessment for journal publications in hydrology (2016)Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings – a practical guide (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,718 cited
  • 1995Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis950 cited
  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping356 cited
  • 2015Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?215 cited
  • 2001Something rotten at the core of science?105 cited
  • 2009Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research94 cited
  • 2014Joint Editorial—On the future of journal publications in hydrology20 cited
  • 2015Reproducible Research in Vadose Zone Sciences16 cited
  • 2015Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions16 cited
  • 2013Meta‐analysis inside and outside particle physics: convergence using the path of least resistance?12 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?243 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work