SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Chapter 9: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews
0 references·3 citing·8 second hop
Chapter 9: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2019)Chapter 9: Diagnostic test accuracy syste…Implementing GRADE in systematic reviews that adhere to JBI methodological conduct (2024)Implementing GRADE in systema…Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews (2020)Toolkit of methodological res…Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews (2020)Toolkit of methodological res…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018)Effects of gamification on academic motivation and confidence of undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)Data analysis and presentation methods in umbrella reviews/overviews of reviews in health care: A cross-sectional study (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2024Implementing GRADE in systematic reviews that adhere to JBI methodological conduct36 cited
  • 2020Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews19 cited
  • 2020Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work