Osiromašenje novinarstva

Abstract

Članek izhaja iz razprav o osiromašenju novinarstva kot dela, ki je skozi tehnološke inovacije zgodovinsko razpeto med poslovnimi cilji, usmerjenimi v realizacijo dobička medijskim lastnikom, in novinarskimi cilji povezovanja državljanov z družbenim življenjem na podlagi pravice do komuniciranja. Normativno skrb za komuniciranje so avtorji poročila Mnogo glasov, en svet utemeljili na pravici do komuniciranja, ki zadeva državljanske zmožnosti biti informiran, izražati mnenje in participirati v javnem življenju, ter se odmaknili od razumevanja svobode tiska, ki sloni predvsem na lastninski pravici. Na podlagi teorije delovnega procesa članek razgrinja logiko razsposabljanja novinarjev in proučuje implikacije deprofesionalizacije novinarstva za uveljavljanje pravice do komuniciranja, pri čemer se podrobneje ukvarja s pojavi prekarizacije, protrošništva in robotizacije v novinarstvu.The article derives from debates on impoverishment of journalism as labour that has been through technological innovations historically torn between business goals aimed at realizing profits for media owners and journalistic goals of connecting citizens to social life grounded on the right to communicate. The authors of the report Many Voices, One World based their normative concerns for communication on the right to communicate that concerns citizens’ abilities to access information, voice opinions and participate in public life and thereafter departs from understandings of press freedom that rest on property rights. By adopting the labour process theory the article reveals the logic of deskilling of journalists and analyses implications of deprofessionalization of journalism for enforcing the right to communicate with a special emphasis on the phenomena of precarization, prosumption and robotization in journalism.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.