Appealing Statistics

Peter Donnelly

18 citations0/0 files storedSignificance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

Abstract In the case of Regina versus Adams [1996], DNA evidence seemed to suggest that there was a 1 in 200 million chance that an innocent person would match the DNA found at the crime scene. Peter Donnelly explains how he subsequently became involved in the case and found himself trying to explain Bayes's Theorem to judge and jury.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2018Interpretation continues to be the main weakness in criminal justice systems: Developing roles of the expert witness and court 2008Errors in Judicial Decisions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.