SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publication bias in the German social sciences: an application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals
16 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Publication bias in the German social sciences: an application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals (2015)Publication bias in the German social sci…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaNegative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Negative results are disappea…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research (2008)Publication Bias in Empirical…H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. (2007)H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, …Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…The politics of publication (2003)The politics of publicationPractical Meta-Analysis (2000)Practical Meta-AnalysisHARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Publication Decisions Revisit…Are all Economic Hypotheses False? (1992)Are all Economic Hypotheses F…Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: A note on meta-analysis bias. (1986)Effect of positive findings o…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…Publication bias in the social sciences since 1959: Application of a regression discontinuity framework (2025)Publication bias in the socia…Meta-Analyse (2019)Meta-AnalyseThe cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions (2021)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1968)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Practical Meta-Analysis9,196 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2,374 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,995 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,473 cited
  • 2007H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1.1,255 cited
  • 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 1995Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa493 cited
  • 2003The politics of publication359 cited
  • 1992Are all Economic Hypotheses False?297 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research
247 cited
  • 1986Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: A note on meta-analysis bias.165 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Publication bias in the social sciences since 1959: Application of a regression discontinuity framework6 cited
    • 2019Meta-Analyse6 cited