No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Newtonian forces are pushes and pulls, possessing magnitude and direction, that are exerted (in the first instance) by objects, and which cause (in particular) motions. I defend Newtonian forces against the four best reasons for denying or doubting their existence. A running theme in my defense of forces will be the suggestion that Newtonian Mechanics is a special science, and as such has certain prima facie ontological rights and privileges, that may be maintained against various challenges. 1. Introduction2. Newtonian mechanics ontologically irrelevant?2.1. …because superseded in classical contexts?2.2. …because only restrictedly applicable?2.3. …because incompatible with more fundamental theories?3. Are forces fictions?4. Are forces ontologically redundant?5. Do forces induce causal overdetermination?5.1. Response: Newtonian forces as aspects5.2. Response: forces as intermediaries6. Conclusion
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.