SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer Review
12 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Peer Review (2015)Peer ReviewWho's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Planned Obsolescence (2011)Planned ObsolescenceHere comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations (2008)Here comes everybody: the pow…Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry (2004)Peer Review: A Critical Inqui…The peer‐review process (2002)The peer‐review processThe history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review (2002)From Book Censorship to Acade…Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses (2002)Editorial Peer Review: Its St…The evaluation of peer‐review quality (2001)The evaluation of peer‐review…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…The history of the Royal Society of London .... (1968)The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (1988)The history of the Royal Society of London for the improving of natural knowledge (2001)Tourism and Post-Disciplinary Enquiry (2006)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors (2010)Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. (1973)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study (2017)Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline (2013)Ranking Games (2014)A Chronicle of Higher Education (2017)Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2009)Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation (2012)The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013)A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication? (2011)Commensuration Bias in Peer Review (2015)Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science (2015)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 (2012)“Words with Friends”: Socially Networked Reading onGoodreads (2013)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations2,323 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 2002The peer‐review process206 cited
  • 2002From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review200 cited
  • 2011Planned Obsolescence137 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2132 cited
  • 2004Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry124 cited
  • 2002Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses90 cited
  • 2001The evaluation of peer‐review quality31 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work