SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Appraising Evidence · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterAppraising Evidence

Unknown author2018

Chapter2018

Appraising Evidence

Unknown author

5 citations·0/0 files stored·Springer eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence 2015STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklistreview · 11 shared references 2023Assessing risk of bias and applicabilityother · 9 shared references 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health carearticle · 8 shared references 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaborationarticle · 8 shared references 2019Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An updatereview · 8 shared references 2022STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaborationarticle · 8 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typechapter

Published2018-01-01

VenueSpringer eBooks

Languageen

Citations5

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-3-319-78966-8_9

openalex_workW4249704129

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.