SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey
7 references·2 citing·36 second hop
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey (2019)Methods of conduct and reporting of livin…Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise (2018)Ensuring quality as the basis…Living systematic reviews: 3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses (2017)Living systematic reviews: 3.…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making (2024)A living critical interpretiv…Pragmatic and open science-based solution to a current problem in the reporting of living systematic reviews (2022)Pragmatic and open science-ba…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses (2008)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study (2018)Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence? (2018)A guide to prospective meta-analysis (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey (2019)Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR – An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting (2019)Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals (2021)Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide (2018)Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses148 cited
  • 2018Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise20 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Pragmatic and open science-based solution to a current problem in the reporting of living systematic reviews11 cited
  • 2024A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work