Consequentializing

Douglas W. Portmore

66 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy Compass

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Political Philosophy and Ethics Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

Abstract A growing trend of thought has it that any plausible nonconsequentialist theory can be consequentialized, which is to say that it can be given a consequentialist representation. In this essay, I explore both whether this claim is true and what its implications are. I also explain the procedure for consequentializing a nonconsequentialist theory and give an account of the motivation for doing so.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

n.d.A theory of justice original edition 2004The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro‐attitudes and Value 1985Utilitarianism and the Virtues 1994The Rejection of Consequentialism 1974Utilitarianism, For and Against 2007Teleology, Agent‐Relative Value, and ‘Good’2006Contemporary debates in moral theory 1993Structures of Normative Theories

Cited by

2011The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons 2016Consequentializing and its consequences 2014A FAULT LINE IN ETHICAL THEORY 2016XIV—Cluelessness 2020Contractualism 2009SIDE CONSTRAINTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF COMMONSENSE ETHICS*

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.