SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?
5 references·13 citing·50 second hop
Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? (2010)Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of e…Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs (2009)Looking for Landmarks: The Ro…Publication bias and merit in ecology (2007)Publication bias and merit in…The number that's devouring science (2005)The number that's devouring s…What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)What determines the citation …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count (2020)The relationship of polarity …Social media-based sleeping beauties: Defining, identifying and features (2020)Social media-based sleeping b…Identifying the princes base on Altmetrics: An awakening mechanism of sleeping beauties from the perspective of social media (2020)Identifying the princes base …F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals (2019)F1000Prime recommended articl…Perception of the importance of chemistry research papers and comparison to citation rates (2018)Perception of the importance …Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact (2018)Exploratory analysis of Publo…Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics (2016)Path analysis of the relation…The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores (2015)The influence of time and dis…The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F 1000 recommendations (2015)The effects of research level…Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Supplementary Report I to the…Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”? (2015)Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—A…Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F 1000 P rime peer review (2015)Interrater reliability and co…Good news for the people who love bad news: an analysis of the funding of the top 1% most highly cited ecologists (2012)Good news for the people who …Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. (1981)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field‐normalized bibliometric indicator (2016)What are we measuring? Refocusing on some fundamentals in the age of desktop bibliometrics (2018)Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors (2022)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)F 1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations (2013)The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2013)Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets (2014)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES (1999)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Publication and Related Biases (2001)What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success (2006)The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology (2009)Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management (2014)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association (2013)Citations Gone #Social: Examining the Effect of Altmetrics on Citations and Readership in Communication Research (2019)Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers (2020)Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: five altmetric sources observed over a decade show evolving trends, by research age, attention source maturity and open access status (2023)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Are negative reviews, predatory reviewers or failed peer review rewarded at Publons? (2020)How the high-impact papers formed? A study using data from social media and citation (2020)Thirty Six Years of Information Systems Management: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. (2003)Posted, visited, exported: Altmetrics in the social tagging system BibSonomy (2016)Judicious Use of Bibliometrics to Supplement Peer Evaluations of Research in Kinesiology (2019)A network embedding-based scholar assessment indicator considering four facets: Research topic, author credit allocation, field-normalized journal impact, and published time (2021)What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? (2007)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2004What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?367 cited
  • 2005The number that's devouring science243 cited
  • 2009Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs168 cited
  • 2007Publication bias and merit in ecology102 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F 1000 P rime peer review34 cited
  • 2016Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics27 cited
  • 2015The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores26 cited
  • 2018Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact25 cited
  • 2018Perception of the importance of chemistry research papers and comparison to citation rates18 cited
  • 2020Social media-based sleeping beauties: Defining, identifying and features17 cited
  • 2015The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F 1000 recommendations17 cited
  • 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?14 cited
  • 2020The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count13 cited
  • 2019F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals11 cited
  • 2020Identifying the princes base on Altmetrics: An awakening mechanism of sleeping beauties from the perspective of social media8 cited
  • 2012Good news for the people who love bad news: an analysis of the funding of the top 1% most highly cited ecologists8 cited