Comparisons between Adaptive Patterns in Two Serial Experiments

Abstract

SUMMARYIn this paper a serial mirror-drawing test was compared with an adaptation of Stroop's colour-word test to serial scoring. Since the validity of the serial colour-word test was better known than the validity of the mirror-drawing test, indices in the latter test were constructed so as to correspond as closely as possible with indices previously used in the former. Although most correlations emerged according to prediction, differences between the two test situations could not be completely bridged. Correlations were on the whole highly significant in dimensions where the mirror-drawing test had previously proved to correspond to well-defined clinical syndromes.—The investigation was aided by a grant from the Swedish Medical Research Council.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.