SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Research Fundamentals · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterResearch Fundamentals

Edzard Ernst2018

Chapter2018

Research Fundamentals

10 citations·0/0 files stored·Springer eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Research, Science, and Academia Business Strategies and Management Research Diverse Academic Research Areas

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2014Scientific method: Statistical errors 1998Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials 2017The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p -values 2013An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature 2009Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health 2013Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019Reporting trends of p values in the neurosurgical literaturereview · 4 shared references 2023Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-valuesarticle · 4 shared references 2023Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975–2017)article · 4 shared references 2015A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)article · 3 shared references 2017The distribution of P -values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significancearticle · 3 shared references 2018Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature – A systematic reviewreview · 3 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typechapter

Published2018-01-01

VenueSpringer eBooks

Languageen

Citations10

Files0 public / 0

ShelfResearch, Science, and Academia

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-3-319-69941-7_2

openalex_workW4255101616

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.