Federalism and Ethnic Conflict Regulation in India and Pakistan

Katharine Adeney

179 citations0/0 files storedPalgrave Macmillan US eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

South Asian Studies and Conflicts Political Systems and Governance Political Conflict and Governance

Abstract

Katharine Adeney demonstrates that institutional design is the most important explanatory variable in understanding the different intensity and types of conflict in the two countries rather than the r

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 179 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2009Must Pluri-national Federations Fail?2014Restructuring States, Restructuring Ethnicity: Looking Across Disciplinary Boundaries at Federal Futures in India and Nepal 2020Population and Politics 2012Ethiopia's Experiment in Accommodating Diversity: 20 Years’ Balance Sheet 2014Ethnofederalism: The Worst Form of Institutional Arrangement…?2014Shifting Tides in South Asia: Reform and Resistance in Nepal 2021Policing the federation: the Supreme Court and judicial federalism in India 2012Language Conflicts in Social Arenas: Reflections for the Business World

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.