The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trialRobert Mcnutt1990-03-09articleJAMA216 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open AccessAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 216 citations exist upstream.Cited by2009We Have to Break Up1999Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews2003Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses1997Peer review: reform or revolution?2019Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?1994Effect of Institutional Prestige on Reviewers' Recommendations and Editorial Decisions2004An ?important contribution? or ?tiresome reading?? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions