SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations
16 references·3 citing·45 second hop
Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations (2022)Assessing Open Science practices in physi…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports (2021)An Excess of Positive Results…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 (2018)Reproducible research practic…The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation (2017)The Human Behaviour-Change Pr…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change (2012)Theories and techniques of be…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaThe behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The behaviour change wheel: A…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyAnswering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)Answering the Call for a Stan…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Rethinking how and when to report descriptions of behavior change content within interventions: a case study of an ongoing physical activity trial (ready steady 3.0) (2023)Rethinking how and when to re…Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy (2023)Open Science Standards at Jou…Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices (2022)Development of the Brief Open…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial (2012)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior (2004)Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (2008)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (2018)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions13,651 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2007Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data4,219 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic864 cited
  • 2012Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change521 cited
  • 2021An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports372 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation
339 cited
  • 2018Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017267 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy12 cited
    • 2022Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices9 cited
    • 2023Rethinking how and when to report descriptions of behavior change content within interventions: a case study of an ongoing physical activity trial (ready steady 3.0)4 cited