SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)
13 references·2 citing·48 second hop
Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE) (2022)Reporting quality of clinical trial proto…Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials (2017)Worldwide trends in volume an…Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol (2016)Systematic evaluation of pati…Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols (2014)Systematic Evaluation of the …SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012)Guidelines for randomized cli…Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2010)Comparison of protocols and r…Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory (2009)Reporting on blinding in tria…Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet (2008)Selective reporting in clinic…Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Comparison of descriptions of…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Nonregistration, Discontinuation, and Nonpublication of Randomized Trials (2025)Nonregistration, Discontinuat…A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study (2022)A longitudinal assessment of …The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Cochrane Library (2005)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Publication guidelines need widespread adoption (2011)The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomized clinical trial publications (2014)Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance (2006)Standards of reporting: the use of CONSORT PRO and CERT in individuals living with osteoporosis (2017)Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of haematological malignancies according to international quality standards: a systematic review (2020)Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles (2023)How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) (2014)Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal (2016)SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
  • 2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited
  • 2014Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols82 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review81 cited
  • 2009Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory56 cited
  • 2010Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials56 cited
  • 2017Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials25 cited
  • 2016Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited

Cited by

  • 2022A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study21 cited
  • 2025Nonregistration, Discontinuation, and Nonpublication of Randomized Trials13 cited