SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio Among Academic Orthopedic Hand Surgeons: A Novel Measure of Research Impact
14 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio Among Academic Orthopedic Hand Surgeons: A Novel Measure of Research Impact (2022)Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio…The relative citation ratio and the h-index among academic ophthalmologists: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis (2021)The relative citation ratio a…Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons (2020)Assessment of the NIH-support…Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health–Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists (2018)Evaluation of the Relative Ci…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize (2016)Citation Metrics: A Primer on…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)Using Publication Metrics to …Bibliometric Indices and Academic Promotion within Plastic Surgery (2014)Bibliometric Indices and Acad…Impact fact‐or fiction? (2013)Impact fact‐or fiction?Standardizing the Evaluation of Scientific and Academic Performance in Neurosurgery—Critical Review of the “h” Index and its Variants (2012)Standardizing the Evaluation …Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America (2009)Comparison of the h index wit…The state of h index research (2008)The state of h index researchWhat do we know about the h index? (2007)What do we know about the h i…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The Relative Citation Ratio: An Impartial Assessment of Productivity in Academic Otolaryngologists (2023)The Relative Citation Ratio: …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants (2011)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Alternatives to the impact factor (2013)The creative person in science. (2013)The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards (2014)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites (2015)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks (2007)Chairs of United States Academic Ophthalmology Departments: A Descriptive Analysis and Trends (2018)Twitter Mentions and Academic Citations in the Urologic Literature (2018)Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine (2021)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? (2019)Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda (2020)A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)A Correlation Between National Institutes of Health Funding and Bibliometrics in Neurosurgery (2013)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)Comparison of Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator and h-index for Neurosurgical and Spinal Surgical Journals (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
  • 2008The state of h index research396 cited
  • 2014Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact377 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric Indices and Academic Promotion within Plastic Surgery111 cited
  • 2012Standardizing the Evaluation of Scientific and Academic Performance in Neurosurgery—Critical Review of the “h” Index and its Variants99 cited
  • 2016Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize89 cited
  • 2009Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America56 cited
  • 2020Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons54 cited
  • 2018Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health–Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists43 cited
  • 2013Impact fact‐or fiction?36 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The relative citation ratio and the h-index among academic ophthalmologists: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis
25 cited

Cited by

  • 2023The Relative Citation Ratio: An Impartial Assessment of Productivity in Academic Otolaryngologists9 cited