SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis
14 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis (2022)Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for …The Kilim plot: A tool for visualizing network meta‐analysis results for multiple outcomes (2020)The Kilim plot: A tool for vi…The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers (2020)The effects of communicating …CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)CINeMA: An approach for asses…Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis (2020)Charting the landscape of gra…The dark side of the force: Multiplicity issues in network meta‐analysis and how to address them (2019)The dark side of the force: M…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science (2019)Communicating uncertainty abo…Risk and Uncertainty Communication (2017)Risk and Uncertainty Communic…Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article (2017)Common pitfalls and mistakes …The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes (2016)The rank-heat plot is a novel…Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines (2016)Network meta-analyses should …Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. (2011)Effective communication of ri…Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses (2004)Imputing response rates from …A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis (2000)A simple method for convertin…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (2011)How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients (1979)Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta‐analysis (2014)Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta‐analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long‐term outcomes of all main treatment types (2021)The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta‐analysis (2021)From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior (1985)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test (2012)Communicating Health Risks With Visual Aids (2013)Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. (2018)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)Research Techniques Made Simple: Network Meta-Analysis (2018)Network Meta-Analysis (2021)A multifaceted graphical display, including treatment ranking, was developed to aid interpretation of network meta-analysis (2023)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)The influence of mental fatigue on brain activity: Evidence from a systematic review with meta‐analyses (2020)The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses (2022)Treatment of eating disorders: A systematic meta-review of meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (2022)Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms (1961)Perception of Risk (1987)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Guidance on Communication of Uncertainty in Scientific Assessments (2019)Impfbereitschaft mit einem COVID-19-Vakzin und Einflussfaktoren. Ergebnisse einer telefonischen Bevölkerungsbefragung (2021)A comparative analysis of experienced uncertainties in relation to risk communication during COVID19: a four-country study (2022)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020)The Evolving Field of Risk Communication (2020)Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance (1995)Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions (2008)Education at a Glance 2018 (2018)Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition (2020)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis1,923 cited
  • 2000A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis1,445 cited
  • 2019Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science449 cited
  • 2020The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers344 cited
  • 2004Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses337 cited
  • 2017Risk and Uncertainty Communication248 cited
  • 2016The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes219 cited
  • 2011Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening.210 cited
  • 2016Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines202 cited
  • 2017Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article106 cited
  • 2020Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis79 cited
  • 2020The Kilim plot: A tool for visualizing network meta‐analysis results for multiple outcomes55 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019The dark side of the force: Multiplicity issues in network meta‐analysis and how to address them40 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.