SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review (2022)Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Proto…Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults (2021)Digital Ageism: Challenges an…Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology (2019)Inclusion of Older Adults in …Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Dissecting racial bias in an …Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care? (2019)Can AI Help Reduce Disparitie…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Fintech Risk Management: A Research Challenge for Artificial Intelligence in Finance (2018)Fintech Risk Management: A Re…Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism (2018)Contemporary Perspectives on …The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity (2017)The Ugly Truth About Ourselve…Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics (2017)Artificial Intelligence and L…Getting Grandma Online: Are Tablets the Answer for Increasing Digital Inclusion for Older Adults in the U.S.? (2015)Getting Grandma Online: Are T…Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings (2015)Automated Experiments on Ad P…A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly (2015)A nuanced understanding of In…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users (2010)‘But obviously not for me’: r…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons (2003)Ageism: Stereotyping and Prej…Design of Experiments (1936)Discrimination in online ad delivery (2013)Learning Fair Representations (2013)How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms (2016)Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability (2016)Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. (1981)Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. (1988)Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. (1990)A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo (2004)The Social Psychology of Stigma (2004)Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map (2008)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society (2005)The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? (2015)Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide (2017)The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color (1991)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) (2020)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) (2021)Fairness through awareness (2012)Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning (2016)Why is depression more common among women than among men? (2016)Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments (2017)Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms (2020)Algorithmic Bias in Education (2021)Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023)CLAUDETTE: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service (2019)How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence (2020)The Next Generation of Research on IS Use: A Theoretical Framework of Delegation to and from Agentic IS Artifacts (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation45,728 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 2019Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations7,674 cited
  • 2015Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings870 cited
  • 2018Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism681 cited
  • 2003Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons653 cited
  • 2017Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics490 cited
  • 2015A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly436 cited
  • 2019Can AI Help Reduce Disparities in General Medical and Mental Health Care?405 cited
  • 2017The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity343 cited
  • 2019Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology290 cited
  • 2021Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults289 cited
  • 2010‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users273 cited
  • 2015Getting Grandma Online: Are Tablets the Answer for Increasing Digital Inclusion for Older Adults in the U.S.?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

260 cited
  • 2018Fintech Risk Management: A Research Challenge for Artificial Intelligence in Finance198 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.