Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public

16 references·3 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1929Stability in Competition6,933 cited
1948On the Rationale of Group Decision-making2,461 cited
2004The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data1,153 cited
2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
1985The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction.1,046 cited
2000Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker801 cited
2014Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison570 cited
1992Myth of the Independent Voter425 cited
2015Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?419 cited
2012On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public350 cited
2017Recent Methods for the Study of Measurement Invariance With Many Groups260 cited
2007Supreme Court Appointments as a Move‐the‐Median Game121 cited
2004The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court115 cited
2020Curbing the Court90 cited
2018Reassessing the Supreme Court: How Decisions and Negativity Bias Affect Legitimacy79 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010

"How Not to Lie with Judicial Votes: Misconceptions, Measurement, and Models"

63 cited

Cited by

2023Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights47 cited
2024Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory47 cited
2024Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post- Dobbs world26 cited