SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Responsibility gaps and the reactive attitudes
16 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Responsibility gaps and the reactive attitudes (2022)Responsibility gaps and the reactive atti…Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence (2021)Group Agency and Artificial I…There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap (2020)There Is No Techno-Responsibi…Race and Gender (2020)Race and GenderEmbedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems (2020)Embedding Values in Artificia…Attributions of ethical responsibility by Artificial Intelligence practitioners (2020)Attributions of ethical respo…Responsible Artificial Intelligence (2019)Responsible Artificial Intell…Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility (2017)Mind the gap: responsible rob…Robots, law and the retribution gap (2016)Robots, law and the retributi…Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)Internet Encyclopedia of Phil…Bridging the Responsibility Gap in Automated Warfare (2013)Bridging the Responsibility G…Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality (2010)Moral appearances: emotions, …Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents (2009)Virtual moral agency, virtual…Killer Robots (2007)Killer RobotsThe responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata (2004)The responsibility gap: Ascri…Sentiment and Value (2000)Sentiment and ValueResponsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology (1988)Responsibility, Character, an…Reactive Attitudes and AI-Agents – Making Sense of Responsibility and Control Gaps (2024)Reactive Attitudes and AI-Age…“ChatGPT says no”: agency, trust, and blame in Twitter discourses after the launch of ChatGPT (2024)“ChatGPT says no”: agency, tr…Group Agency (2011)Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies (2015)The University of Chicago Law Review (2017)Collecting the Public Perception of AI and Robot Rights (2020)Making moral machines: why we need artificial moral agents (2020)Person, Thing, Robot (2023)Reassembling the Social (2005)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Constructing grounded theory (2014)Ethical implications of text generation in the age of artificial intelligence (2022)Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making (2022)Trustworthy AI and robotics: Implications for the AEC industry (2022)Moral Luck (1981)Do Artifacts Have Politics? (2017)Automation, work and the achievement gap (2020)Self-Driving Vehicles—an Ethical Overview (2021)Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem? (2022)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)We have never been modern (1994)Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations (2021)Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles (2021)GPT-3 and InstructGPT: technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “Contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry (2022)Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy? (1999)The Turing Triage Test (2004)Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account (2018)Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability (2019)Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021)The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro‐attitudes and Value (2004)The Nature of Normativity (2007)The Emotional Construction of Morals (2009)Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018)In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability (2020)The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing (2020)An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics (2022)Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI (2022)Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making (2024)Why critical literacy should turn to ‘the affective turn’: making a case for critical affective literacy (2015)An architecture for ethical robots inspired by the simulation theory of cognition (2017)Human Dignity and Human Rights (2018)Mental Health Stigma as Social Attribution: Implications for Research Methods and Attitude Change (2000)Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business (2003)Moral repair: reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata1,095 cited
  • 2019Responsible Artificial Intelligence1,064 cited
  • 2007Killer Robots593 cited
  • 2000Sentiment and Value365 cited
  • 1988Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology365 cited
  • 2020Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems255 cited
  • 2015Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy241 cited
  • 2020There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap196 cited
  • 2016Robots, law and the retribution gap192 cited
  • 2020Attributions of ethical responsibility by Artificial Intelligence practitioners161 cited
  • 2017Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility156 cited
  • 2010Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality139 cited
  • 2021Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence131 cited
  • 2020Race and Gender110 cited
  • 2009Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents108 cited
  • 2013Bridging the Responsibility Gap in Automated Warfare

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

91 cited

Cited by

  • 2024“ChatGPT says no”: agency, trust, and blame in Twitter discourses after the launch of ChatGPT14 cited
  • 2024Reactive Attitudes and AI-Agents – Making Sense of Responsibility and Control Gaps11 cited