References

• 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
• 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
• 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
• 2017Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission162 cited
• 2015How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals135 cited
• 2019Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment77 cited
• 2021A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior74 cited
• 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services55 cited
• 2017The preprint debate: What are the issues?54 cited
• 2016Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions37 cited
• 2017Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections33 cited
• 2016Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry26 cited
• 2014Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review19 cited
• 2000Early uptake of research findings after fast-track publication17 cited
• 2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences