SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices
16 references·1 citing·53 second hop
Development of the Brief Open Research Survey (BORS) to measure awareness and uptake of Open Research practices (2022)Development of the Brief Open Research Su…Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever (2022)Rise of the preprint: how rap…A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms (2022)A community-sourced glossary …UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (2021)UNESCO Recommendation on Open…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The past, present and future …Pre‐registration: Why and How (2020)Pre‐registration: Why and HowOpen science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Fast Lane to Slow Science (2019)Fast Lane to Slow ScienceReproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 (2018)Reproducible research practic…Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Va…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Academic Research in the 21st…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaThe behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The behaviour change wheel: A…Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey (2009)Effects of Questionnaire Leng…Practical routes to preregistration: a guide to enhanced transparency and rigour in neuropsychological research (2025)Practical routes to preregist…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys (2000)E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review (2006)Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels (2010)Developing a Questionnaire (2015)The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead (2018)Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior (2004)Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (2008)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (2018)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Little Science, Big Science (1963)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies (2019)Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (1965)The Satisfaction With Life Scale (1985)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance (2020)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses (2020)An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports (2021)The case for formal methodology in scientific reform (2021)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions (2024)Evaluating the linguistic coverage of OpenAlex : An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions13,651 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2009Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey1,303 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
  • 2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2021The past, present and future of Registered Reports497 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2021UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science446 cited
  • 2018Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017267 cited
  • 2020Pre‐registration: Why and How214 cited
  • 2019Fast Lane to Slow Science162 cited
  • 2022A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms161 cited
  • 2022Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

129 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Practical routes to preregistration: a guide to enhanced transparency and rigour in neuropsychological research7 cited