Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers

16 references·8 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
2000Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility1,073 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2019Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news875 cited
2008Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science800 cited
2013New media landscapes and the science information consumer430 cited
2018Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?416 cited
2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
2002Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making395 cited
2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
2017Data-driven predictions in the science of science266 cited
2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science

246 cited

Cited by

2022Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills46 cited
2024Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science26 cited
2023Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment20 cited
2025The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media17 cited
2025Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers16 cited
2022The Gender Gap in Scholarly Self-Promotion on Social Media12 cited
2023How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers10 cited
2023Ten simple rules for socially responsible science8 cited