SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol (2022)Development of a Guideline to Enhance the…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Product Review: Covidence (Systematic Review Software) (2014)Product Review: Covidence (Sy…The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensu…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAG…Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis (2011)Quality and rigor of the conc…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies* (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation (2007)Concept Mapping for Planning …Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement (2016)Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement (2016)STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies*1,629 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2012THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES1,256 cited
  • 2007Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation1,191 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 2013The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development809 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Product Review: Covidence (Systematic Review Software)
718 cited
  • 2011Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis597 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.