Decoding revenge buying in retail: role of psychological reactance and perceived stress

Astha Sanjeev Gupta · Jaydeep Mukherjee

30 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Retail Behavior Studies Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Abstract

Purpose COVID-19 pandemic-related Government restrictions on the movement of people resulted in consumers moving away from retail outlets. However, sporadic instances of an unexpected surge in retail buying happened across the world immediately after the lifting of such restrictions. This uncommon phenomenon, termed revenge buying, offered an opportunity to revive retail businesses. This paper applies Reactance Theory (RCT) and Self-determination Theory (SDT) to model consumers' revenge buying intentions. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected from 384 respondents in India using validated scales. The study used structural equation modelling for model testing. Findings COVID-19 restrictions resulted in autonomy need frustration in consumers, which induced psychological reactance and perceived stress. Psychological reactance positively impacted, while perceived stress negatively impacted revenge buying intentions. Thus, revenge buying was observed only when the psychological reactance was more than perceived stress. Research limitations/implications This study, conducted in only one country with a limited convenience sample, limits the generalizability of findings. Originality/value This research model the psychological consequences of need frustration to explain the sporadic incidences of revenge buying in retail outlets. Further, it proposes sales recovery strategies for retailers in the immediate post-pandemic market scenarios. Retailers' strategies should focus on alleviating stress and anxiety because of health concerns, highlighting the retail buying experience to stimulate the need to visit the outlet and positioning retail buying as a potential reactance response by consumers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 2000Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions 2011Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models 1998Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research 2012Self-Determination Theory 2013On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle.2020Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions 2006Self‐Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self‐Determination, and Will?

Cited by

2023Revenge buying after the lockdown: Based on the SOR framework and TPB model 2023Revenge buying: The role of negative emotions caused by lockdowns 2023Unpacking the influence of anthropomorphism and stereotypes on consumer attitude towards luxury brand 2023“Buy local” campaigns in times of crisis: insights from reactance theory 2024

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.