SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN
16 references·1 citing·46 second hopsampled
Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)Development and validation of a risk-of-b…The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)The Delphi Technique: Making …STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Development of a critical app…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning (2014)Cronbach's alpha reliability:…CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research (2014)CRIS Guidelines (Checklist fo…Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity (2013)Testing a tool for assessing …Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Assessing risk of bias in pre…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Towards systematic reviews th…The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)The Delphi method as a resear…Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Methodological index for non‐…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank (2024)Identifying assessment criter…An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)the delphi method: techniques and applications (1975)Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences (2005)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research (2011)Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence (2014)Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in adult bereavement: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence (2025)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020)Foundations of Behavioral Research (1974)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2003Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument7,590 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2004The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications4,764 cited
  • 2020The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus4,498 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2012Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement2,554 cited
  • 2016Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)2,368 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2014Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning1,235 cited
  • 2013Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,164 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2005Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making589 cited
  • 2014CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research453 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank14 cited