SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The application of artificial intelligence on different types of literature reviews - A comparative study
16 references·1 citing·44 second hop
The application of artificial intelligence on different types of literature reviews - A comparative study (2022)The application of artificial intelligenc…Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol (2022)Automation of literature scre…Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis (2021)Publication patterns’ changes…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence and t…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Literature review as a resear…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Automated content analysis: addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution (2016)Automated content analysis: a…The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The STM Report: An overview o…RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)RobotReviewer: evaluation of …Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…RAMESES publication standards: meta‐narrative reviews (2013)RAMESES publication standards…RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care (2003)Evaluating meta-ethnography: …Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approa…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool (2015)Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure (2009)Case study research: design and methods (2011)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? (2020)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Machine learning in crime prediction (2023)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines11,435 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2003Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care921 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews611 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review430 cited
  • 2015The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing396 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: meta‐narrative reviews324 cited
  • 2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
  • 2021Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews298 cited
  • 2021Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

205 cited
  • 2016Automated content analysis: addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution186 cited
  • 2022Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol44 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper18 cited