SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are social sciences becoming more interdisciplinary? Evidence from publications 1960–2014
16 references·6 citing·42 second hop
Are social sciences becoming more interdisciplinary? Evidence from publications 1960–2014 (2022)Are social sciences becoming more interdi…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Computational Social Science and Sociology (2020)Computational Social Science …Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies (2015)Tradition and Innovation in S…Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity (2015)Interdisciplinarity and Impac…Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)Frascati Manual 2015Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Does Interdisciplinary Resear…Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account (2015)Diversity of references as an…The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2011)The Oxford handbook of interd…Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature (2010)Approaches to understanding a…On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact (2009)On the relationship between i…Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)Is science becoming more inte…Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment (2009)Interdisciplinarity: A Critic…Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)Diversity and network coheren…A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society (2007)A general framework for analy…Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2004)Multidisciplinarity, interdis…Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals (2002)Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and…From Disciplinary Depth to Interdisciplinary Breadth: The Case of Public Administration (2025)From Disciplinary Depth to In…Facilitating interdisciplinarity: the contributions of boundary-crossing activities among disciplines (2024)Facilitating interdisciplinar…Towards indicating interdisciplinarity: Characterizing interdisciplinary knowledge flow (2023)Towards indicating interdisci…The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact—a novel perspective on citation accumulation (2023)The relationship between inte…The different ways to write publishable research articles: Using cluster analysis to uncover patterns of APPRAISAL in discussions across disciplines (2023)The different ways to write p…Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 years (2023)Dynamics and characteristics …The New Production of Knowledge (1994)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)Patterns of connections and movements in dual‐map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis (2013)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)What is research collaboration? (1997)How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? (2009)Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards (2012)Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation (2018)Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)“Opening Up” and “Closing Down” (2007)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences (2002)Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management (2010)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Prominent but Less Productive (2016)The Logic of Practice (1990)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies (2022)Distributional Structure (1954)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2013)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 (2023)Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas (2023)OECD Patent Statistics Manual (2009)OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2009)Reducing the precarity of academic research careers (2021)The production of social science research in Nigeria: status and systemic determinants (2022)A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science (2013)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society1,154 cited
  • 2015Frascati Manual 20151,129 cited
  • 2011The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity1,016 cited
  • 2009Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time786 cited
  • 2010Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature770 cited
  • 2009Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience660 cited
  • 2015Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies618 cited
  • 2009Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment601 cited
  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough513 cited
  • 2004Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology393 cited
  • 2015Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity342 cited
  • 2020Computational Social Science and Sociology304 cited
  • 2002Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals293 cited
  • 2009On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact223 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity220 cited
  • 2015Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account209 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 years31 cited
    • 2023The different ways to write publishable research articles: Using cluster analysis to uncover patterns of APPRAISAL in discussions across disciplines22 cited
    • 2023The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact—a novel perspective on citation accumulation20 cited
    • 2023Towards indicating interdisciplinarity: Characterizing interdisciplinary knowledge flow19 cited
    • 2024Facilitating interdisciplinarity: the contributions of boundary-crossing activities among disciplines18 cited
    • 2025From Disciplinary Depth to Interdisciplinary Breadth: The Case of Public Administration10 cited